Need a quotation?

Dear Customers, if you wish to receive a quotation, we kindly ask you to fill in below form. Once the form has been duly filled and submitted, the rates will be quoted to you.

SEARCH SITE BY TYPING (ESC TO CLOSE)

Skip to Content

Blog

Port of Los Angeles surpasses 740,000 TEUs in March

In March, the Port of Los Angeles saw a remarkable surge, handling 743,417 container units, marking a 19% increase compared to the same month in the previous year.

This achievement marked the eighth consecutive month of year-over-year growth at the busiest port in the United States.

During the first quarter ending on 31 March, local dockworkers facilitated the movement of 2,380,503 TEUs across Los Angeles marine terminals, representing a nearly 30% rise from 2023. This performance ranks among the Port’s strongest first-quarter starts, second only to the import surge witnessed during the pandemic in 2021 and 2022.

“Moving into April and the second quarter, I expect robust cargo flow to continue here. A strong job market and continued consumer spending, along with our ability to handle additional volume, will help drive cargo to Los Angeles in the coming months,” stated Gene Seroka, executive director of Port of Los Angeles.

Seroka, accompanied by Anne Neuberger, deputy national security advisor for Cyber and Emerging Tech, addressed the Port’s media briefing. Neuberger, in her role as deputy assistant to President Biden, provides counsel on cybersecurity, digital innovation, and emerging technologies.

During the briefing, Neuberger discussed President Biden’s recent executive order aimed at strengthening cybersecurity measures at US ports.

In March 2024, loaded imports at 379,542 TEUs rose by 19% compared to the previous year. Loaded exports amounted to 144,718 TEUs, marking a notable 47% increase from the previous year. This month’s export performance was the Port’s strongest since January 2020, extending a streak of 10 consecutive months of year-over-year export growth.

The Californian port also handled 219,158 empty containers, reflecting a 7% increase over the figures from 2023.

Source video: Port of Los Angeles

READ MORE

Port of Rotterdam handles 3.3 million TEUs in 2024 Q1

For the first time in three years, the container segment of the Rotterdam port is experiencing a slight uptick in throughput volumes.

There’s been a 3.3% increase in tonnes moved, rising from 31.5 million tonnes to 32.5 million tonnes, and a 2% rise in TEUs, reaching 3.3 million TEUs in the first quarter of 2024 at the Dutch port.

The situation in the Red Sea resulted in a notable decline in ships (-24.5%) and volume from Asia (-13.7%) during January and February, attributed to delays and missed sailings. Initially, accommodating the altered sailing schedules required adjustments in the logistics chain.

The overall demand for freight remains largely unchanged, with the situation now stabilized. In March, there was a notable increase in the number of arriving ships (11.5%), and volumes from Asia rebounded. Positive results were also observed in other shipping regions, driven by a cautious economic recovery and destocking activities.

Moreover, in the first quarter of 2024, total throughput at the port of Rotterdam decreased by 1.4% compared to the corresponding period last year. Specifically, throughput amounted to 110.1 million tonnes, down from 111.7 million tonnes in the first quarter of 2023.

This decline is primarily attributed to reduced throughput of coal, crude oil, and oil products. However, there was an increase in throughput of iron ore & scrap and LNG. Additionally, container throughput showed a 3.3% increase during this period.

Furthermore, there’s been a significant surge (29%) in feeder traffic from Rotterdam to Mediterranean seaports. This increase is attributed to ships rerouting via the Cape of Good Hope, bypassing certain ports, and transporting cargo destined for the region via feeder vessels from Rotterdam to Mediterranean ports.

However, the total throughput of the breakbulk market segment, including Roll-on/Roll-off and other breakbulk, experienced a slight decline of 1.9% to 7.8 million tonnes. Specifically, Roll-on/Roll-off throughput decreased by 3.8% to 6.3 million tonnes compared to the first quarter of last year, mainly due to ongoing challenges in volumes to the UK. Conversely, other breakbulk saw a notable increase of 7.4% to 1.5 million tonnes.

Dry bulk throughput experienced a 4.5% decrease compared to the first quarter of 2023. Meanwhile, liquid bulk throughput saw a 3.1% decline, amounting to 52.6 million tonnes.

“The throughput figures show limited imports of raw materials and exports of finished products. This tells us that European industrial production is still suffering from high energy prices and low demand from the biggest declining sectors such as construction and the processing and automotive industries. From the growth in container throughput, we see the first signs that world trade is picking up. However, these tentative signs remain highly uncertain due to rising global tensions,” stated Boudewijn Siemons, CEO & Interim COO of the Port of Rotterdam Authority.

Source: Container News

READ MORE

ANNOUNCEMENT OF HUNG KINGS’ FESTIVAL HOLIDAY 2024 !!!

Mac-Nels Vietnam hereby would like to announce our schedule for Hung Kings’ Festival 2024 as follows:
🔶 Hung Kings’ Festival: Thursday – 18th April, 2024
🔶 Re-open for business: Friday – 19th April, 2024
For assistance during the holiday, please directly contact our Customer Support or email us at sales@macnels.com.vn
Wish you a happy and safe holiday!
READ MORE

23 Important Maritime Codes Used in the Shipping Industry

The shipping industry is an extremely professional line of work with set rules and guidelines with regard to the personnel that serves on ships as well as the operation of the ship itself.

To have a standardized system of working on board, the presence and implementation of rules and regulations are imperative; it is for this reason that shipboard operations are directly mandated and under the purview of Conventions, Regulations and, for the purposes of the comprehension of this article, codes.

The presence of the aforementioned ensures that all operations pertaining to seafaring are bound by the presence of an agreed upon framework to maintain legal operating condition of ships, shipping operator or company, and the ship’s crew with the intention to upkeep the safety of personnel or property and eliminate and/or minimise pollution or damage to the marine environment.

The International Maritime Organisation (IMO) is responsible to implement and amend different codes as per types of ships, goods or cargoes, Cargo operation, maritime security, shipbuilding, the safety of the crew, training etc. Failure to comply with such Codes renders any shipboard operation to legal liabilities.

Following is a list (indicative and not exhaustive) of maritime codes put forth by IMO and used by ships and companies as per the regulations:

1) IMDG Code(International Maritime Dangerous Goods): Code for carrying dangerous cargo through sea transport. This Code is in place to regulate the carriage of international guideline to the safe transportation or shipment of dangerous goods or hazardous materials by water on the vessel.

2) IMSBC Code(International Maritime Solid Bulk Cargo Code): is a mandatory regulation for carrying solid cargo in bulk form. This replaces the BC Code and ensures safe stowage and shipment of solid bulk cargoes.

3) IGC Code(International code for construction and equipment of ships carrying liquefied gases in bulk): This code gives guidelines to gas tankers on operational, construction and safety aspects. As with the other forms of cargo and their respective codes, this code is specific to the carriage of LPG?

4) International Grain Code: This code is applicable to all ships carrying grain in bulk. The term “grain” covers wheat, maize (corn), oats, rye, barley, rice, pulses, seeds and processed forms thereof, whose behavior is similar to that of grain in its natural state.

5) IBC Code(International code for construction and equipment of ships carrying dangerous chemicals in bulk): This code pertains to the carriage of chemicals in bulk and the design, construction, equipment with respect to the ship and the cargo.

6) ISPS Code(International Ship and Port Facility Security code): Springing from the events preceding 9/11, this code lays the minimum security measures for ships and ports.

7) ISM Code(International Safety Management Code): Perhaps one of the most important codes, one that is used in the day to day functioning of the ship, it is in place for the safe operation of the ship for the purposes of pollution prevention.

8) INF Code(International code for Safe Carriage of Packaged Irradiated Nuclear Fuel): Plutonium and High radioactive waste on board ship is a complete guideline for all ships including cargo ships of 500GT and above carrying INF listed cargo.

9) IS Code(International Code for Intact Stability): gives the construction guidelines to vessels to maintain the stability of the ship at all working conditions.

10) TDC Code(Code of safe practices for ships carrying Timber Deck Cargo): gives complete guidelines for loading, stowage, construction, and equipment. This code came about as a revision to the code adopted in 1991.

11) Casualty Investigation Code: Shipboard can be hazardous and the nature of the work can, under unfortunate circumstances, result in a casualty onboard. This code is used to solve or to study the casualty happened on board with the ship or with its crew.

12) CSS Code(Code of Safe Practice for Cargo Stowage and securing): is a guideline for onboard staff to store and secure the cargo as per the requirement.

13) SPS Code(Code for the safety of Special Purpose Ships): which include drilling, cable laying, Flip ship (survey ship) etc, basically for ships that are of unusual construction as compared to the conventional merchant ships. This code elaborates all the safety aspects of such ships from construction to operation.

14) STCW Code(Seafarer’s training, certification and Watch keeping): code is a guideline for producing competent seafarers all over the world. This code has recently been amended in 2010 at Manila and the revised version will enter from 1st Jan 2012. Note that this is one of the most important codes and every aspiring and existing seafarer must be thorough with the provisions of this code

15) OSV Code(Code of safe practices for Offshore Supply Vessel): is a complete guideline for offshore vessels carrying supply cargo and personnel in coastal operations.

16) MODU Code(Mobile Offshore Drilling Unit code): is a requirement for construction and equipment to be used for safe operation in offshore drilling units. This code updates and revises the provisions under the 1989 MODU Code.

17) HSC Code(High-Speed Craft code): This code primarily pertains to, among others, air-cushion vehicles (such as hovercraft) and hydrofoil boats. is used to maintain a safe standard for construction equipment and operation of high-speed vessels used in maritime industry.

18) LSA Code(International Life Saving Appliances Code): comes under SOLAS which deals with the safety equipment in terms of construction, operation and other requirements for well being of crew onboard ship. Note that this code is imperative in the procuring, application and maintenance of all lifesaving appliances on board.

19) FSS Code(International Fire Safety System Code): also comes under SOLAS. It deals with all the fire fighting appliances, measures, and system to be used onboard to detect, notify and extinguish any kind of fire in sea going vessel. Note that this this code is imperative in the procuring, application and maintenance of all fire fighting equipment on board.

20) FTP Code (Fire Test Procedure code): is the guideline for manufacturers and ship builders to construct vessels and fire test parts to be used onboard ships. For obvious reasons, the provisions of this code can be read in conjunction with the FSS Code.

21) Polar Code: This Code came into force on 1st January, 2017. Mandated under SOLAS as well as MARPOL, this code aims to protect the ships and lives of the personnel on ship from the harsh conditions at the poles.

22) Code of Safe Working Practices for Merchant Seafarers: Provides guidance for improving health and safety on board ship which is intended primarily for merchant seafarers.

23) Code of Conduct for the Merchant Navy: This Code aims to provide a system of adherence with regard to personal conduct onboard a merchant ship.

Source: Marine Insight

READ MORE

What are Logistics Risks?

Transportation, warehousing, and inventory management are fraught with risks at all levels. For a successful buy-sell transaction or vice versa, all risk factors must be considered, managed, and countermeasures executed, leaving no room for error.

However, logistics management and execution of its various functions are not easy tasks. Each step has to be handled with care. Achieving zero-error performance might not always be possible, but every step should be taken to aim for this.

Supply chain disruptions happen when logistics management and task execution are not synchronised and, in some cases, when unexpected events occur.

Supply chain disruptions can have far-reaching and disastrous consequences. Besides delays in deliveries, it can affect product quality, create shortages or excess of stocks, and upset warehousing and storage capacities.

Also, projects may often be delayed, their overall costs shoot up, and strategies go off track. Frequent disruptions can affect an organisation’s reputation.

Risks associated with transportation and storage are the most common in logistics. Breakdowns and failures can be prevented to a large extent by proper planning and having backup plans in place.

What are the Main Logistics Risks Faced by Businesses Today?

This can be quite an exhaustive list, but let’s review the main risks that logistics organisations face.

Supply Risks

Relying on a sole supplier might have its benefits, but imagine if they suddenly decide to turn off the supply. Having one or two backup suppliers who can be relied on in such situations can help to a certain extent.

Maintaining good supplier relationships can go a long way toward ensuring uninterrupted supplies. Suitable software with strong forecasting techniques helps produce reliable figures that can, in turn, help the supplier plan production accordingly. This helps prevent stock-outs and overstocks.

Transportation Issues

Transportation is the backbone of the logistics industry. Without it, the physical movement of goods, whether for buying or selling, can never be complete. Arranging the correct type of transport for moving the required quantities is crucial in avoiding transportation risks.

However, transportation depends on many factors, such as cost, the quantity and quality of goods being moved, journey distance, proximity to ports and railway yards, and others.

Goods can spoil or deteriorate with time if mishandled during transport and storage. Temperature-sensitive goods must be transported in the right containers, and refrigerators or temperature-controlled containers help to maintain the quality of the goods transported.

As in warehousing, goods are mainly transported under ambient, chilled, or frozen conditions, depending on the type of goods. Accurate storage temperatures, as the customer prescribes, must be followed during transportation to prevent spoilage and deterioration.

For example, grains are often transported under ambient conditions. Fruits and vegetables are transported over long distances in chilled containers, while meat, fish, and poultry are transported in refrigerated containers.

Most of the transport today involves multimodal containers. Reputed transport operators handle multimodal transport arrangements efficiently. Eventualities such as equipment breakdown, alternate routing, staffing, labour issues, etc., are often considered by these operators while planning the transport of goods.

Handling and Storage Risks

Technologically advanced warehouses for the storage of temperature-sensitive products are common these days. They are designed to store such products at the required temperature, humidity, and other conditions that ensure their quality, texture, etc.

Warehouse operators have to ensure that the vehicles used for transporting goods to customers, containers, Material Handling Equipment (MHEs), and their warehouses are maintained and serviced correctly at the prescribed intervals to avoid breakdown.

Security Risks

Modern multimodal containers are mostly theft- and pilferage-proof. Similarly, modern warehouses are designed to prioritise security. In addition to security personnel, cameras and sensors are installed at critical points to deter pilferage, theft, and unauthorised access.

Cyber Risks

Hackers can compromise an organisation’s information system. This often leads to the organisation’s confidential information finding its way into the open net, leading to considerable cyber risks.

Sensitive data relating to finance, customers, and shipments should never fall into the wrong hands where it can be misused. Hackers often steal data to sabotage operations.

Some ways to minimise cyber risks include using updated and original software with anti-malware, data encryption, and enforcing system access control for employees.

Political Events and Natural Calamities

Wars, conflicts, and significant political upheavals pose considerable logistics and business operations risks. Similarly, forces of nature, such as storms, floods, fires, etc., are natural calamities beyond mankind’s control.

Both are considered ‘force majeure’ or ‘acts of god’. They interrupt the normal flow of work and often cause damage and destruction of property. Though very little can be done about such instances, arrangements can be made to transport goods by an alternate mode of transport, such as having warehousing arrangements at different locations.

Logistics Risk Assessment

Most modern logistic organisations carry out periodic risk assessments. Such assessments help pinpoint the source of risks and their impact on logistics operations. Risks are analysed, and precautions are taken to minimise or prevent them.

Develop contingency plans that are workable and can be mobilised quickly. Policies and procedures considering such situations should be developed, or existing ones should be updated and enforced by logistics companies.

What Else Can We Do to Minimise Logistics Risks?

It is essential to have robust policies and procedures that are easy to understand while covering all aspects of logistics operations and business. Communication is vital in any operation.

Encourage cross-department and one-to-one communication between employees, and make sure that management communicates well with their employees.

Staff training and motivation are crucial here.

Learn from the competition. They might have a few good note-worthy points to help you run your organisation more efficiently and effectively. Join the local logistics association, where ideas and interests can be shared to help grow the business collectively.

New risks can occasionally arise. Safety protocols should be developed, updated, and enforced to combat such unexpected risks.

Source: Marine Insight

READ MORE

TIPC upgrades container terminals in Kaohsiung

Container Terminal 7 of the port of Kaohsiung, which started operations in May 2023, is expected to increase the annual container handling capacity of the Taiwanese port by 6.5 million TEUs, according to Taiwan International Ports Corporation (TIPC), which is now focussed on the upgrade of two other box terminals.

TIPC has now shifted its attention to Port of Kaohsiung’s 3rd and 5th Container Terminals and adjacent container yard areas aiming to further enhance port competitiveness and realize sustainable growth goals.

TIPC noted that “with shipping companies commissioning increasingly larger container ships, streamlining hub and feeder port operations, and raising overall shipping capabilities, existing port infrastructures, from wharf water depths and support facilities to navigation channels, are increasingly inadequate for industry needs.”

Therefore, beyond constructing the new Container Terminal 7, TIPC has allocated an additional budget of NT$4.469 billion (around US$140 million) to improve and upgrade infrastructures at the port’s 3rd and 5th Container Terminals, which, once completed, will significantly increase the handling capacity and operational efficiencies.

At Container Terminal 3 Wharf No. 70, the water depth will be lowered from -13.5m to -15.2m, and 100 feet (30.48 metres) of new gantry crane track along with new dockside handling equipment will be installed. Additionally, at Container Terminal 5 Wharf Nos. 77~79, the water depth will be lowered from -14.5m to -17.0, and 120 feet (36.60 metres) of new gantry crane track along with new dockside handling equipment will be installed.

Furthermore, in line with ongoing green-port commitments, new onshore power and water supply systems are being installed to move TIPC ports closer to international zero-carbon targets.

The works on the two container terminals began on 21 February 2024 and the project is scheduled to be completed by summer 2027.

TIPC has decided to split the project into several phases in order not to affect the normal operations of the port.

Moreover, TIPC will jointly invest with shipping companies in the Container Terminal 5 improvement work, with TIPC handling wharf improvements and companies upgrading container yard facilities. Once completed, companies may invest in and install state-of-the-art container handling equipment and shipside gantry cranes to handle the world’s largest-class container carriers.

In addition, the deepening of water depths in and around these terminals will improve safe access to modern container ships, increase the advantage to shipping operators, and raise port operating efficiencies, according to the TIPC statement.

Source: Container News

READ MORE

Port of Hong Kong faces severe connectivity loss

Recent service networks released by the container shipping alliances reveal a noticeable trend: Major shipping companies are rapidly scaling back their presence in Hong Kong along East-West shipping routes.

Gemini’s latest network overview reveals no scheduled direct deep-sea calls to Hong Kong. Likewise, the Ocean Alliance’s 2024 network update shows a significant reduction in direct port calls, plummeting from 11 to just six. Additionally, in THE Alliance’s newly published 2025 Transpacific network overview, Hong Kong is notably absent from their Pacific South West and Pacific North West services, leaving only one Asia-US East Coast service remaining.

“Source: Sea-Intelligence.com, Sunday Spotlight, issue 658”

The latest data from the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) on the Liner Shipping Connectivity Index (LSCI) also underscores a continual decline in connectivity for Hong Kong over the past decade, as depicted in Figure 1. The LSCI for Hong Kong hit its lowest point of 388 in 2023-Q4, with a marginal uptick to 390 in 2024-Q1. Despite slight fluctuations, the overarching pattern indicates a consistent and sharp decline.

“While this does not bode well for the Port of Hong Kong, it should also be seen as a sign that an element of network consolidation is afoot, especially as it relates to transshipment hubs,” said Alan Murphy, CEO of Sea-Intelligence, a Danish maritime data analysis firm.

He pointed out, “Analysis of network design and network efficiency will show that fewer, but larger, hubs are economically more efficient. Hong Kong appears to be the first major ‘victim’ of this. But as the new alliance constellations improve their networks in the coming years, more ports could likely risk the same fate as Hong Kong.”

Source: Container News

READ MORE

MSC tops reefer rankings too

MSC has developed the largest capacity for refrigerated containers, as the Swiss-Italian liner giant strengthens its status as the largest liner operator.

Alphaliner’s report noted that MSC’s fleet has grown nearly 20% over the past year, and its 815 ships have 583,700 reefer plugs installed, representing an increase of almost 18%.

Only Ocean Network Express (ONE) recorded a bigger growth in the number of reefer plugs, at approximately 23%. The pan-Japanese carrier grew its overall fleet by 17.5%.

Meanwhile, South Korean flagship carrier HMM is the only liner operator which reduced its reefer capacity, which dipped by just over 1%, as it reduced its overall fleet by over 2% after redelivering some chartered ships.

Not surprisingly, the ranking of the top 10 carriers by reefer plugs is generally tied to the ranking by total fleet capacity. The one exception is the 10th-ranked ZIM Line, which is the eighth-largest in terms of reefer plugs. The Israeli carrier can deploy over 22% of its fleet to carry reefers.

Alphaliner’s reefer plug count confirms that European carriers have a larger proportion of their total capacity accessible for reefer cargo. The percentage of slots available for plugged-in reefer boxes ranges from 20% for MSC to 23% for Maersk Line, with CMA CGM (22.5%) and Hapag-Lloyd (21.2%) in between. This compares to 15.7%-17.5% for their Asian counterparts, with ONE at the top end and HMM at the low end.

Source: Container News

READ MORE

ONE announces updated Transpacific network for 2025

Ocean Network Express (ONE) has announced its upgraded Transpacific service network, which will commence in February 2025.

The carrier’s Transpacific product comprises 16 primary services, each tailored to deliver efficient and reliable shipping solutions.

ONE’s Transpacific service network for 2025:

Asia – US West Coast South

FP1 (Far East – Pacific 1):

From Europe, Singapore (Singapore), Kobe (Japan), Nagoya (Japan), Tokyo (Japan), Los Angeles/Long Beach (United States), Oakland (United States), Tokyo (Japan), Shimizu (Japan), Kobe (Japan), Nagoya (Japan), Tokyo (Japan), Singapore (Singapore), to Europe

PS3 (Pacific South 3):

Nhava Sheva (India), Pipavav (India), Colombo (Sri Lanka), Port Kelang (Malaysia), Singapore (Singapore), Cai Mep (Vietnam), Haiphong (Vietnam), Yantian (China), Los Angeles/Long Beach (United States), Oakland (United States), Tokyo (Japan), Pusan (South Korea), Shanghai (China), Ningbo (China), Shekou (China), Singapore (Singapore), Port Kelang (Malaysia), Nhava Sheva (India)

PS4 (Pacific South 4):

Xiamen (China), Yantian (China), Kaohsiung (Taiwan), Keelung (Taiwan), Los Angeles/Long Beach (United States), Oakland (United States), Keelung (Taiwan), Kaohsiung (Taiwan), Xiamen (China)

PS6 (Pacific South 6):

Qingdao (China), Ningbo (China), Los Angeles/Long Beach (United States), Oakland (United States), Kobe (Japan), Qingdao (China)

PS7 (Pacific South 7):

Singapore (Singapore), Laem Chabang (Thailand), Cai Mep (Vietnam), Shanghai (China), Los Angeles/Long Beach (United States), Oakland (United States), Shanghai (China), Singapore (Singapore)

PS8 (Pacific South 8):

Shanghai (China), Ningbo (China), Kwangyang (South Korea), Pusan (South Korea), Los Angeles/Long Beach (United States), Oakland (United States), Pusan (South Korea), Kwangyang (South Korea), Incheon (South Korea), Shanghai (China)

AP1 (Asia Pacific 1):

Haiphong (Vietnam), Cai Mep (Vietnam), Shekou (China), Xiamen (China), Taipei (Taiwan), Ningbo (China), Shanghai (China) (Yangshan), Los Angeles/Long Beach (United States), Oakland (United States), Shekou (China), Haiphong (Vietnam)

AHX (Asia Hawaii Express):

Pusan (South Korea), Yokohama (Japan), Honolulu (United States), Pusan (South Korea)

Asia – US West Coast North

PN1 (Pacific North 1):

Xiamen (China), Kaohsiung (Taiwan), Ningbo (China), Nagoya (Japan), Tokyo (Japan), Tacoma (United States), Vancouver (Canada), Tokyo (Japan), Kobe (Japan), Nagoya (Japan), Xiamen (China)

PN2 (Pacific North 2):

Singapore (Singapore), Laem Chabang (Thailand), Cai Mep (Vietnam), Haiphong (Vietnam), Yantian (China), Vancouver (Canada), Tacoma (United States), Tokyo (Japan), Kobe (Japan), Shanghai (China), Singapore (Singapore)

PN3 (Pacific North 3):

Qingdao (China), Ningbo (China), Shanghai (China), Pusan (South Korea), Vancouver (Canada), Tacoma (United States), Pusan (South Korea), Qingdao (China)

Asia – US East Coast

EC1 (US East Coast 1):

Kaohsiung (Taiwan), Yantian (China), Shanghai (China), Ningbo (China), Pusan (South Korea), Panama, New York (United States), Norfolk (United States), Savannah (United States), Panama, Balboa (Panama), Kaohsiung (Taiwan)

EC2 (US East Coast 2):

Xiamen (China), Yantian (China), Ningbo (China), Shanghai (China), Pusan (South Korea), Panama, Manzanillo-PA (Panama), Savannah (United States), Charleston (United States), Wilmington (United States), Norfolk (United States), Manzanillo-PA (Panama), Panama, Pusan (South Korea), Xiamen (China)

EC5 (US East Coast 5):

Laem Chabang (Thailand), Cai Mep (Vietnam), Singapore (Singapore), Colombo (Sri Lanka), Suez, Halifax (Canada), New York (United States), Savannah (United States, Jacksonville (United States), Charleston (United States), Norfolk (United States), New York (United States), Halifax (Canada), Suez, Singapore (Singapore), Laem Chabang (Thailand)

EC6 (US East Coast 6):

Kaohsiung (Taiwan), Hong Kong (China), Yantian (China), Ningbo (China), Shanghai (China), Pusan (South Korea), Panama, Houston (United States), Mobile (United States), Panama, Rodman (Panama), Kaohsiung (Taiwan)

WIN (West India North America):

Bin Qasim (Pakistan), Hazira (India), Nhava Sheva (India), Mundra (India), Damietta (Egypt), Algeciras (Spain), New York (United States), Savannah (United States), Jacksonville (United States), Charleston (United States), Norfolk (United States), Damietta (Egypt), Jeddah (Saudi Arabia), Bin Qasim (Pakistan)

Source: Container News

READ MORE

ONE targets market share with 2030 strategy

Singapore-headquartered Ocean Network Express (ONE) is looking to leapfrog its THE Alliance partner Hapag-Lloyd as the fifth largest carrier with a sustained fleet growth of around 10% per year to the end of this decade.

The company said in its recently released ONE 2030 strategy that it will invest US$25 billion in its fleet to add close to 1.2 million TEUs in capacity, taking its standing fleet to 3 million TEUs.

Stefan Verberckmoes, senior analyst at Alphaliner said, “One of the main reasons explaining the strategy is that they are aware that a carrier needs economies of scale to be profitable to finance decarbonisation.”

However, former research analyst Mark McVicar believes, “The move is an attempt to gain market share, but in order for the market to remain buoyant it relies on the assumption that others will cede market share.”

Fleet growth for the Singapore-based line will increase over the six-year period from around 4%, which is below the level of market growth, to 10% annually, higher than the projected market growth to the end of the decade. Accountants PWC projects annual global GDP growth of around 3-3.5%.

“ONE should realise an annual fleet growth of around 10% until 2030 to reach its goals. That’s indeed a very ambitious plan in a market where moderate growth and overcapacity is expected,” added Verberckmoes.

The ONE 2030 plan includes delivering sustainable solutions for its vessels to meet new regulations and the acquisition of terminals in key regions of the world.

In addition, the company will identify key growth regions, with increasing cargo flows, strengthen its customer service support, meeting customers’ requirements for digitalised services.

Moreover, ONE expects to move into areas within the logistics “value chain”. Dynamar analyst Darron Wadey said the company cites its moves for Atlas and the terminal operations of its Japanese shareholders, MOL, NYK and K Line.

Wadey also points out that “No specific mention of logistics has been made,” and that the company has allocated some US$10 billion to develop these what ONE calls “adjacent” businesses.

He added, “Should ONE make a definitive move into container logistics, this could be facilitated by its shareholders in a similar way to how it entered into container terminal investments, namely taking over stakes held by its parents.

“Buying into its parent’s already well-established and extensive logistics presences would make sense. For starters, ONE would not be burdened by expensive start up from scratch costs. It would also avoid creating a competitor to its shareholders’ existing activities.”

Transforming its fleet and services will mean that the carrier will target US$3.8 billion profits by the end of the implementation period, an aim that McVicar described as “reasonable”.

According to ONE, the initial two years of ONE 2030 are the years during which the industry may be affected by newbuildings. However, due to geographic and political factors such as the ongoing Red Sea crisis, it is rather difficult to predict the profit level in a logical manner, said the company.

Nevertheless, ONE predicts that after these two years, profits will be boosted by a better supply and demand balance and that its returns will also improve as a result of the early benefits of its strategy.

Source: Container News

READ MORE