Need a quotation?

Dear Customers, if you wish to receive a quotation, we kindly ask you to fill in below form. Once the form has been duly filled and submitted, the rates will be quoted to you.

SEARCH SITE BY TYPING (ESC TO CLOSE)

Skip to Content

About: macnelsvietnam

Recent Posts by macnelsvietnam

CMA CGM announces new Panama Canal surcharges

French container shipping company CMA CGM has announced new Panama Canal surcharges for several routes worldwide.

In particular, CMA CGM will implement a surcharge of US$150 per TEU for all types of cargo from the US West Coast ports of Los Angeles, Long Beach and Oakland to North Europe, Scandinavia, Poland and Baltic, effective from 12 January.

Additionally, the ocean carrier will introduce the same surcharge from South America West Coast to Canada East Coast on 1 January.

Moreover, CMA CGM will apply a US$150 Panama Canal surcharge to South America West Coast from Central America East Coast, the Caribbean, Leeward, Windward and French West Indies on 1 January, excluding shipments ex-Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands for which the surcharge will be effective from 20 January.

Source: Container News

READ MORE

Oakland sees declined box traffic in November

The Port of Oakland reported a 6.8% drop in its container volumes in November, handling 132,648 TEUs.

Full imports rose 3.8% year-on-year, with 71,258 TEUs passing through Oakland port facilities this November. On the other hand, full exports declined by 3% to 61,390 TEUs. At the same time, empty imports experienced a drop of 0.6%, with 14,118 TEUs, while empty exports experienced a significant 49% decrease, with 19,613 TEUs moving through the US port.

“We saw some canceled sailings in November as evidenced by the dip in vessel calls last month,” stated Port of Oakland maritime director, Bryan Brandes. “This caused our volumes to drop.”

This year the Californian port did not see the usual spike in import cargo volumes during late summer and the fall.

“Consumers continue to spend, and our local economy is growing, so the lack of an upswing in cargo volume is likely because retailers are working through excess inventory,” commented Brandes.

He added, “Meanwhile, we’ve been investing and implementing projects that will improve the efficiency of our maritime operations. This puts us in an excellent position to handle more cargo.”

Source: Container News

READ MORE

The first ship of Regional Container Lines (RCL) opened an international transport route through Chan May Port

On December 14, at Wharf No. 2 – Chan May Port under Chan May Port Joint Stock Company, a welcoming ceremony was held for the ship Isara Bhum to make its first voyage to Chan May port.

At the welcoming ceremony, Ms. Ho Hoang Thi, Deputy General Director of the Company, thanked the companionship, support and cooperation in all aspects of the port industry authorities, customers and partners who have contributed to development of Chan May Port and joyfully welcome the event of Regional Container Lines (RCL) opening an international transport route through Chan May Port.

As a driving force in promoting the development of Chan May – Lang Co Economic Zone, Chan May Port always strives to develop to attract many shipping lines to the Port, serving the needs of import and export of goods for importers and exporters. businesses in the province, surrounding areas and the East – West Economic Corridor.

The domestic container route through Chan May Port was formed just over a year ago and today will be a new milestone when Chan May port opens an international container transport route in the plan to develop container handling services here.

After a period of research and evaluation of conditions at the port, RCL Shipping Line signed a memorandum of cooperation with Chan May Port on November 24 in Hue city and today welcomed the first ship. docked after a collaborative process. The opening of the international container route from Chan May to ports in Southeast Asia, Japan, India, the Middle East, Africa and vice versa aims to diversify logistics services to help goods from the Central region – Vietnam. Circulate more conveniently and save costs.

Recently, at the 8th session of Thua Thien Hue Provincial People’s Council, the 7th session, the Provincial People’s Council also approved Resolution No. 25/2023/NQ-HDND dated December 7, 2023 on unifying the extension of Extend the implementation time of Resolution 18/2022/NQ-HDND on piloting a number of policies to support shipping lines opening container shipping routes and subjects with goods transported by containers to and from Chan May Port. The policy implementation period is until December 31, 2024.

Source news: Chan May Port

READ MORE

Panama Canal drought could boost New Year rates

 

Drought in Panama and war around the Red Sea and Suez is a slow-burning but developing crisis for the container shipping industry as both canals become choke points that could see freight rates double.

As the rainy season in Panama comes to an end, and notwithstanding the announcement that rain has raised water levels allowing the Panama Canal Authority to increase the number of daily transits, the outlook for next year remains tight.

Chief analyst at Xenata, Peter Sand, said the dry season could see services for the US East Coast diverted via Suez though with the security situation in the Red Sea deteriorating the industry may face some tough choices regarding the routeing for services.

“Rates could easily double as a consequence,” said Sand, adding, “There are seven weekly services that transit the Panama Canal, if they were all to be re-routed via Suez that would require an extra three ships on each service to maintain the weekly calls.”

He qualified that saying that vessels would have to operate at current speeds, but if they increased speeds by a single knot it could reduce the requirement to two ships, while slowing down could raise the number to four extra ships.

“Shippers had been hoping for a period of lower rates but now with both canals becoming choke points the upshot could see delays to cargo, higher costs and greater uncertainty,” claimed Sand, “I call it a slow-burning disaster”.

With July the next rainy season in Panama there will be a need for the canal reservoirs to be replenished, but if the rains fail to lift the water levels sufficiently in the next rainy season the delays and restrictions could last into 2025, said Sand.

One source also pointed to the fact that the demand on the Panama Canal reservoirs is not only from the maritime sector but the water is supplied to the growing population in the canal region, putting further pressure on the water levels and probably adding to ship delays said a maritime source, who preferred to remain anonymous.

VesselBot, an Athens-based tech company, has analysed the current number of vessels waiting to transit the Panama Canal, with the extra emissions from extended waiting times included.

CEO and founder at VesselBot, Constantine Komodromos, said, “The peak for vessels entering the [Panama Canal] anchorage concluded in October, and there was a bottleneck in November. As shown in graph 1, in October, 404 vessels entered both anchorages and resulted in an average of 32.55 hours waiting at anchorage in November, making it the peak anchorage waiting time through the year.”

Due to the peak of shipping vessels entering the anchorage concluded in October, there is a bottleneck in November. As shown in the graph, in October, 404 vessels entered both anchorages resulting in an average of 32.55 hours waiting at anchorage in November, making it the peak anchorage waiting time through the year. Source: VesselBot

November arrivals had already decreased at the entrances to the canal, explained Komodromos, because of the waiting times, with some vessels re-routing via Cape Horn. However, he added fewer ships are arriving precisely because of the transit delays.

“Vessels when anchored consume fuel for a number of operational reasons, mostly for auxiliary engines. Therefore, the increased waiting time and the higher number of vessels waiting in the anchorage led to the highest emissions produced at anchorages around the Panama Canal,” noted Komodromos.

November saw a spike in emissions to 12,000 tonnes in greenhouse gas emissions, an increase of more than 5,000 tonnes since January of this year, according to Komodromos.

An increase in the emissions from shipping is expected to be seen as both the limitations on the Panama and Suez Canals persist.

SeaRoutes, an emissions tracking tech company, has calculated that vessels transiting the African Cape, rather than heading via Suez will substantially increase fuel consumption and therefore emissions.

In its calculations, SeaRoutes estimates the emissions for a vessel operating from Shanghai to New York via Panama, Suez and the Cape, with the shortest route via Panama and the distance via Suez around 40% longer adding more than half a tonne of CO2/TEU plus more than 30% to the journey time.

Even with the evidence of higher costs for the carriers diverting traffic to avoid the canal choke points, shippers remained unimpressed with the “price signalling” from Xeneta.

James Hookham, director at the Global Shippers’ Forum, pointed out that there are alternatives to the Panama Canal. “We may well see cargo from Asia to the East Coast returning to the Californian ports and using rail to ship to the Midwest,” he said.

Hookham forecasts that should Houthi missiles target gas and oil tankers the US and European nations will need to act to protect commercial shipping, if only to prevent energy prices from spiralling out of control and forcing inflation up again.

That forecast has now come to fruition with escorts led by US forces likely to start in the near future.

Source: Container News

READ MORE

EU ETS surcharges not static

European Union (EU) Emissions Trading System (ETS) surcharges will inevitably evolve as the price of EU Allowances fluctuates, according to Alphaliner’s report.

Shipping (all types) is forecast to represent around 5% of the European Allowance market, while prices will be subject to wider trends in the global energy market, as demand adapts to fuel usage.

So far, there has been no formal shipper opposition to the surcharges, although it remains to be seen if carriers can enforce increases in a weak market, where gains from surcharges may in any case be offset by reductions in the overall rate.

While the levies are based on prevailing EU Allowance (EUAs) prices, the overall range is wide, indicating a variety of methodologies:

  • Asia – North Europe: €20 – €28
  • Asia – Mediterranean: €11 – €23
  • Europe – North America: €24 – €46
  • Intra Europe: €16 – €35

COSCO Shipping Lines is the most expensive out of the four major carriers, charging the highest surcharge on three of the four main trades in this group. The Chinese state-controlled line is charging €29 for reefers on the Asia-North Europe lane; €29 for reefers on the Asia-Mediterranean lane; €63 for reefers on the Europe-North America East Coast lane.

Mediterranean Shipping Company and Maersk remain at the lower end among both the major carriers and the market as a whole.

Although Maersk originally suggested that a €70/FEU levy could be imposed on the Asia-Europe trade, the Danish carrier subsequently adjusted the surcharge downwards, to €42 per FEU (€21 per TEU), and is now one of the ‘cheapest’ in the market.

Shippers using the liner operators’ green services such as Maersk’s ECO Delivery or Hapag Lloyd’s Green Ship will not be subject to the surcharges.

There is also a wide variance in the number of surcharges listed per carrier. Some lines such as ZIM and CMA CGM have grouped large numbers of trades into general categories, listing just nine and six surcharges. At the other end of the spectrum, Hapag-Lloyd cites 43 surcharges, breaking down transatlantic services for example, into 10 different trades.

Source: Container News

READ MORE

New Year 2024 Closing Announcement

New Year is coming, Mac-Nels would like to inform you about the schedule of New Year Holiday 2024 as following:
📆 𝐇𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐝𝐚𝐲 𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐞: 𝐒𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐝𝐚𝐲, 𝐃𝐞𝐜𝐞𝐦𝐛𝐞𝐫 𝟑𝟎 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟑 – 𝐌𝐨𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐲, 𝐉𝐚𝐧𝐮𝐚𝐫𝐲 𝟎𝟏 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟒
📆 𝐁𝐚𝐜𝐤 𝐭𝐨 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤: 𝐓𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐝𝐚𝐲, 𝐉𝐚𝐧𝐮𝐚𝐫𝐲 𝟎𝟐 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟒
Many thanks for your kind attention and being appreciative with this situation. On this occasion, we would like to thank you for your support and cooperation in the year 2023 and look forward to receiving your continuing assistance in 2024.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us:
𝗠𝗔𝗖-𝗡𝗘𝗟𝗦 𝗩𝗜𝗘𝗧𝗡𝗔𝗠
🏛 Ho Chi Minh Office: 28 Mai Chi Tho St., Thu Duc City, Ho Chi Minh City
☎ +84-28 3911 9090
🏛 Hanoi Office: 119 Tran Duy Hung St., Trung Hoa Ward, Cau Giay Dist., Ha Noi City
☎ +84-24 320 22 030
🏛 Hai Phong Office: 03 Le Thanh Tong St., May To Ward, Ngo Quyen Dist., Hai Phong City
☎ +84-225 883 0451
Da Nang Office: Yspace, 110B Nguyen Huu Tho St., Hoa Thuan Tay Ward, Hai Chau Dist., Da Nang City
☎ +84-236 3633 069
📧 sales@macnels.com.vn
READ MORE

Carriers set for major blanking programme

Hong Kong consultancy Linerlytica suggests that the carriers are struggling to achieve the General Rate Increases (GRIs) that they have supposedly imposed amongst the increase in capacity and persistent low demand, which will lead to greater capacity management according to one expert.

Long term shipping commentator and industry insider John McCown in his latest report suggests that the impact on capacity caused by the congestion as a result of the pandemic allowed carriers to take advantage of the market conditions and boost their income to record levels.

Those conditions have now gone, and the reality is that another 34 ships of over 158,000 TEUs have been added to the fleet over the past 30 days, with 72 ships of 187,082 TEUs already idle the market indicators for next year are already ominous.

“The significant portion of the favourable supply/demand dynamic benefiting the carriers during the pandemic era resulted from congestion that absorbed capacity. The conditions that gave rise to the congestion have now gone away and that unwinding has had the effect of increasing capacity,” said McCown.

Exceptional financial results that were achieved during the pandemic congestion favoured the carriers, now the carriers will look for ways to achieve similar returns in the future.

To manage that the carriers will need to bring some semblance of balance back to the supply and demand equation. And that will require a major capacity management programme, argues McCown.

“In particular, the capacity management tool of blanking or cancelling sailings worked particularly well for the carriers at the beginning of the pandemic. The memory of that and the favourable outcome that resulted from its aggressive use will be top of mind,” he said.

Adding that “The industry consolidation in the form of the alliances has made this tool logistically much easier to accomplish and then to refine as necessary. My anticipation is that it will be utilised much more to reduce capacity as the conditions resulting in congestion unwind.”

Although the levels of ordering, are expected to deliver a more than 30% increase in capacity, McCown points out that these statistics are misleading, given that the average size of ship on order is twice that of the average vessel currently trading.

With this in mind a calculation of the number of ships set to be delivered indicates a 15% fleet increase which is driven by cost reduction, “making a much more manageable capacity situation,” said McCown.

While McCown concedes that the levels of ordering are over and above the requirement for merely replacing the fleet, he does calculate that if it is assumed that a new vessel will be operational for 20 years, a 10% orderbook would be sufficient to replace the fleet at zero demand growth.

“If someone was optimistic and pegged growth at 5% annually, you need a 20% order book. An order book approaching 30% could only all be fully utilised if annual growth were in the 10% range,” according to McCown’s estimates.

Source: Container News

READ MORE

Embrace the Year Ahead with Our Desk Calendar 2024!

Dear Valued Customers and Partners,
As the new year unfolds, we want to express our heartfelt appreciation for your continued trust and support. It is with great pleasure that we present to you our exclusive Desk Calendar for 2024 – a token of gratitude for being an essential part of our journey.
For Year 2024, We have decided on ” 100 years of Disney” being main theme (every Kid love Disney growing up and every adult somehow or rather has some connections to them too). We will be giving out proceeds to the orphanage to help them even if for us can be meagre; but for them it’s massive. A little goes a long way.
𝐉𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐧𝐞𝐲 𝐓𝐡𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟒:
This beautifully designed desk calendar is more than just a tool to keep track of dates; it’s a visual journey through the upcoming year.
𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐲 𝐎𝐫𝐠𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐳𝐞𝐝:
Your success is important to us, and we believe that staying organized is a key ingredient. Our desk calendar provides ample space for notes, reminders, and to-do lists, helping you manage your schedule effectively. Whether it’s important meetings, personal milestones, or cherished memories, capture them all in one place.
𝐇𝐞𝐫𝐞’𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐚 𝐑𝐞𝐦𝐚𝐫𝐤𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐘𝐞𝐚𝐫:
May 2024 be a year filled with joy, prosperity, and new opportunities. Thank you for being an integral part of our journey. We look forward to serving you with excellence in the coming year.
Wishing you a wonderful year ahead!
Best regards,
READ MORE

What is Seaway Bill in Shipping?

A seaway bill is a receipt of goods issued by the ocean carrier to the customer (also called the consignor or shipper).

It is a contract by which the ocean carrier undertakes to transport the customer’s cargo in its vessel or vessels, from one point to the other.

It is a non-negotiable contract between the ocean carrier and the customer to deliver the goods booked by the customer to a specific consignee.

It is this non-negotiable nature of the bill that sets it apart from the regular bill of lading.

The seaway bill is usually preferred by companies that deal directly with each other on a regular basis. There is no involvement of a third party in such dealings in which instruments such as bank letter of credit, etc. are not used.

A seaway bill will show a consignor and a single consignee who can receive the goods at the port of discharge.

Both the seaway bill and bill of lading are issued by the carrier to acknowledge receipt of cargo and undertake to transport it from one place to another as per terms and conditions mentioned in the bill.

However, the main difference between a seaway bill and a bill of lading is that while the former is non-negotiable, the latter is negotiable.

When a bill of lading is made to the ‘order of’ a certain party, it means that the ownership of the goods shipped under the document is transferable to a different party.

If the bill of lading is endorsed in the name of another party and the party is in possession of the original endorsed bill, then this party can claim receipt and ownership of the goods.

Negotiable V Non-Negotiable Documents

A negotiable document or instrument allows the holder to transfer the title of ownership of goods to a third party. Normally, there are two parties to such a transfer – the endorser and the endorsee.

The original bill of lading can change hands through endorsement whereby the endorser (the original owner of the cargo) transfers ownership of cargo to the endorsee (the new owner of the cargo as agreed between both the parties).

The cargo is shipped and delivered to the party who holds the original, endorsed bill of lading.

A non-negotiable instrument specifies a single party as the owner and this ownership cannot be endorsed to a third party. The cargo, in this case, is shipped to the originally specified party.

An endorsement to be valid must be signed by the endorser or holder either on the face of the bill or its back-side. The transaction is said to be complete when the instrument is delivered to the endorsee in whose name the ownership has been transferred.

Issuing the Seaway Bill
A seaway bill is usually issued in triplicate – the original and second copies are given to the shipper or consignor, and the third to the consignee. The consignor sends the original to the consignee for clearance and receipt of the cargo into his warehouse.

A seaway bill is a non-negotiable instrument that facilitates easy and fast clearance of goods through telex release or expresses release.

Telex Release

Sometimes the shipper and customer may agree to do away with the practice of exchanging the original bill to facilitate timely clearance and receipt.

Instead, the shipper will surrender the original bill to the ocean carrier or his appointed agent at origin. When it is surrendered, the carrier will send an electronic message confirming this to their office at the destination port.

Once the vessel reaches its destination port and the cargo that is mentioned in the bill is offloaded, the goods will be handed over to the consignee, after verification of the consignee’s identity, etc.

It is normal practice for the shipper to send the customer a confirmation message on the surrender of the original seaway bill. This method is called Telex Release.

An ocean carrier will need all the original copies of the seaway bill to be surrendered at their office. The clearing agent at the destination only has to contact the carrier’s office at the destination with the necessary credentials and documentation to get details of the cargo and its clearance.

An advantage of the telex release is that cargo will be released at the destination port without having to produce the original seaway bill as they are already surrendered at the port of origin.

It, therefore, avoids delays that can happen in the exchange of original documents and subsequent clearance of goods. All that the consignee has to do is to clear Customs, pay all dues to the concerned parties, and take charge of the consignment.

The term ‘telex release’ has stuck on to date even though the message to release cargo without the original bill is conveyed through email or by other electronic means. Earlier this message was conveyed by sending a telex message.

Express Release

In an Express Release, the carrier, after completion of the necessary paperwork and other formalities produces an electronic bill of lading called the Express Bill of Lading. An electronic copy is given to the shipper.

There is no other physical document in this kind of bill of lading and this is all that is required for the consignee to clear the goods once the carrier offloads cargo at his end.

The customer has to just establish his credentials at the carrier’s office. There is no OBL (original bill of lading) when it comes to an express release.

Telex and express release save time and money. An original bill of lading may be lost or delayed in transit. The vessel carrying the cargo might have already reached the discharge port by this time and if it is not cleared within the stipulated period it could lead to storage or demurrage charges – both from the port as well as the ocean carrier.

Telex and express release is mostly used with seaway bills. In other words, these two methods of releasing cargo to the consignee do not work with bills of ladings that are negotiable documents.

There may be exceptions to this whereby, when a telex or express release is requested of a bill of lading, it loses its ‘negotiable document’ status. In such cases, the consignment is delivered only to the consignee named in the bill of lading and cannot be endorsed to another party.

Contents of a Seaway Bill

What does the seaway bill show? The answer to this is simple; pretty much everything that is shown on a bill of lading.

However, a key difference between the two is that a seaway bill will always be titled ‘SEAWAY BILL NON-NEGOTIABLE’.

A seaway bill typically shows the following details, each in their separate fields:

Seaway Bill Number

This is a unique alphanumeric identification code issued by the ocean carrier for identification of the consignment and which is usually quoted on all correspondence related to the shipment.

Consignor

The consignor field shows the name and address of the party who ships the goods through the ocean carrier to his customer. The consignor is the shipper or exporter sending goods and as such, this field may also be labelled as ‘shipper’ or ‘exporter’.

Consignee

In a seaway bill, the consignee is the consignor’s customer. It is the party who receives goods at the port of destination, through his clearing agent, after payment of all customs duties and other dues. The consignor, having sold or transferred the goods to the consignee, cannot change hands further through endorsements or other means.

Notify Party

In a seaway bill, this field is usually left blank as the consignee is the party that is to be notified upon arrival of the vessel at the destination. Some shipping companies may enter the same address as shown under the ‘consignee’, in this field.

Vessel Name and Voyage Number

The name of the vessel on board which the consignment is loaded is shown here. If the vessel has a voyage number, that will be mentioned alongside the vessel name.

Place of receipt

The place of receipt is the location where the goods are handed over to the ocean carrier by the shipper (consignor), which is usually the port of loading. The goods may also have been handed over to the carrier or its agent from a different location, other than the load port.

Port of Loading

Port of loading is the port from where goods are loaded on board the ocean vessel.

Port of Discharge

The port of discharge is the destination port of the cargo where the goods are off-loaded from the vessel for delivery to or collection by the customer (consignee).

Place of Delivery

When the ocean carrier is contracted to deliver the consignment to the address of the customer or an alternative storage location, that is shown under ‘Place of Delivery’. In such cases, the carrier’s office will make arrangements to transport the cargo overland or by other means to the specified place of delivery. The consignee takes delivery of his goods from this location.

Booking ref./ Shipping ref.

The shipping company may have their booking reference or shipping reference numbers. If these are available, these numbers are shown under this field.

Cargo description /Dimensions /Container details

The details shown above is followed by a table that shows the unique container number (or numbers) and the seal numbers. The description of packages and the goods contained therein with the total number of packages are shown in this table. It also contains the gross cargo weight and measurements. These are normally shown in kilograms (KG) and cubic meters (CBM).

International Maritime Organization and Lloyds Register Numbers

Another important number shown on a seaway bill is the IMO (International Maritime Organization) or the Lloyds Register number.

The IMO number is a unique and permanent number that identifies the ship. A unique seven digits number is preceded by the letters IMO (example IMO1234567). This number does not change irrespective of changes to the ship’s owner, flag, or name.

A specialized wing of the United Nations, the IMO is responsible for regulating shipping activities worldwide that include their safety and security.

One of the main tasks of Lloyds Register is the classification of marine vessels. Based in London, it has other business interests that stretch into engineering and technical fields. The Lloyds online register includes information on marine vessels besides other assets that have been classed by the Lloyds Register.

Other Fields on the Seaway Bill

Carrier Endorsements

A seaway bill may include endorsements regarding the mode of freight payment, whether telex or express release, etc. This field will show the ocean carrier agent’s endorsements, both at the port of loading as well as discharge.

It is also common to find details of cargo insurance, inland routing instructions – if any, and such other details in the seaway bill.

Shipped on Board Date

As the heading specifies, this is the date when the goods are taken on board the carrier.

Declared Value of Goods

The declared value of goods is the value as shown on the invoice by the shipper. This value is used for computation of customs duty or any other taxes that may be applicable in the normal course. The ‘declared value’ may or may not be printed on the seaway bill.

Place and Date of Issue

The seaway bill is usually issued from the ocean carrier’s office. It is signed and issued to the shipper or his agent. The place from where it is issued will be shown on the seaway bill.

The date on which the seaway bill is prepared and released to the shipper or his agent is the ‘date of issue’.

Signature

The signature field is normally the last field on the seaway bill. This holds the signature of the ocean carrier’s authorized signatory. It formally binds him as the carrier of cargo as mentioned in the seaway bill. These days most bills do not carry signatures as they are generated digitally.

Disadvantages of a Seaway Bill

Upon issue of a seaway bill, the consignee shown on the bill cannot be changed and goods will only be delivered by the ocean carrier to the specified consignee. Therefore, the seaway bill cannot be used as a negotiable document.

Banks and financial institutions do not accept seaway bills from companies to issue financial guarantees as it does not give them control over the title of goods. On the other hand, bills of lading, because of their negotiable nature, are accepted by such organizations to issue letters of guarantee (letter of credit).

Source: Marine Insight

READ MORE

China yards dominate in boxship orders

Chinese shipyards hold the lion’s share of container ship orders, with at least half of vessels under construction, followed by 34% for South Korean yards and just 8% for Japanese yards.

The figures, pulled from S&P Global Intelligence’ Sea-web data, also show how the Japanese shipbuilding industry is declining due to cheaper manpower costs in China.

The statistics show that there are currently 876 container ships of 6.88 million TEU on order globally. Of these, 514 vessels of 3.66 million TEU, amounting to 53% of the global total, are being constructed in China. In South Korea, 266 container ships of 2.33 million TEU are being built. Japanese shipyards are building 85 boxships of 581,248 TEU.

The Chinese shipyards leading in the boxship orders are Yangzijiang Shipbuilding (holding orders of 94 ships), Shanghai Waigaoqiao Shipbuilding (34 ships), New Times Shipbuilding (31 ships), Jiangnan Shipyard (21 ships), and Hudong-Zhonghua Shipbuilding (16 ships).

S&P’s data showed that between 2009 and 2020, as the container freight market tanked following the global financial crisis in 2008, boxship newbuildings declined, totalling less than 2 million TEU in October 2020, a 17-year low.

However, the situation was reversed when container freight began rebounding in Q3 2020, due to Covid-19-related logistical bottlenecks, and the momentum has continued, albeit with some corrections.

As liner operators made high profits during the market boom, they gravitated towards vessel owning to manage rising charter costs. The data showed that over 50% of the newbuilding orders are from liner operators and the rest are from tonnage providers. MSC has the highest number of vessels under construction, with over 1.5 million TEU on order.

In 2021, container vessel newbuilding orders exceeded 4 million TEU and the current orderbook for container ships now surpasses that for bulk carriers and tankers, a historical first. This means that the current boxship orderbook is more than trebled from the low levels seen in October 2020.

In terms of vessel size, ships in the 12,000 to 17,000 TEU range are the most in demand, accounting for nearly 50% of all boxships on order.

Source: Container News

READ MORE

 

Recent Comments by macnelsvietnam

    No comments by macnelsvietnam