Need a quotation?

Dear Customers, if you wish to receive a quotation, we kindly ask you to fill in below form. Once the form has been duly filled and submitted, the rates will be quoted to you.

SEARCH SITE BY TYPING (ESC TO CLOSE)

Skip to Content

About: Macnels Macnels

Recent Posts by Macnels Macnels

Hapag-Lloyd increases prices to Australia

Hapag Lloyd has announced new rates for Australian destinations that will take effect in the next months.

Hapag-Lloyd increases prices to AustraliaFirstly, the German carrier will implement a peak season surcharge (PSS) of US$500 for 20′ and US$1,000 for 40′ all dry, reefer, non-operating reefer, tank, flat rack and open-top containers. This surcharge will be applicable from 1 August for sailings starting from Taiwan.

One month later, the Hamburg-based box line will introduce the same level of surcharge for all the container types from China, Macau and Hong Kong to Australia.

Additionally, Hapag-Lloyd will set an increased ocean tariff rate for standard and reefer boxes, including high cube containers, from North Europe and the Mediterranean to Australian base ports Adelaide, Brisbane, Fremantle, Melbourne, Sydney.

Effective from 1 August, the new rates will be as follows:

New rates for standard containers

New rates for standard containers

New rates for reefer containers

New rates for reefer containers

Source: Container News

READ MORE

Containers continue to triumph

The container market continues to impress with record-breaking rates and ordering never seen before.

Olivia Watkins, Head Cargo Analyst of VesselsValue, an online valuation and data provider, takes us through what has been happening with orders, transactions, values, rates and trade for the first half of 2021 and how these sky-high figures compare to previous years’ activity.

Containers continue to triumph

Container Ordering

The ordering market for containers is at historic highs. A total of 286 containers were ordered in the first half of 2021. This is up an incredible 790% from H1 2020.

Container newbuild ordering for the first half of each year.

Container newbuild ordering for the first half of each year.

New Panamax container ships, which are typically 13-15,000 DWT, have been at the forefront of the ordering activity. The development of port infrastructure and the ability to fit larger vessels through the Panama Canal has meant this size of vessel is particularly desirable. There are currently 388 New Panamax vessels live on the water at the moment with a further 175 on order across the sector.

The New Panamax type is the favourable container vessel ordered.

The New Panamax type is the favourable container vessel ordered.

Amongst these orders, Seaspan has come in as the top orderer in the first half of 2021, by number of vessels and total value in US$ billion, with all vessels being greater than 12,000TEU which is the New Panamax type.

Evergreen has come in second by total value in US$ billion ordered due to their orderbook comprising of New Panamax and ULCV Containers.

Although Wan Hai Lines is second by number of vessels ordered with the majority of their vessels at around 3,000TEU.

The top five companies to place orders across the container sector and their total spends in US$ million in the first half of 2021.

The top five companies to place orders across the container sector and their total spends in US$ million in the first half of 2021.

Container Sales

On the contrary to the newbuild orders, we’ve seen a significant increase in activity in the secondhand Panamax container ship market. The number of sales is up 780% for year to date 2021 compared to year to date 2020.

Recent acquisitions where new entrants are paying more than US$100,000 per day for a short-term fixture of between 65-80 days has meant owners like MSC have been buying vessels instead of entering the charter market as it works out more cost-effective.

For example, the vessel Mexico (4,839TEU, February 2002, Hyundai HI) sold for US$50.5 million to MSC at the end of June. The alternative would be to take a vessel on a five-year charter which could cost up to US$70 million.

Another benchmark sale confirmed earlier in June was the ship Kowloon Bay (4,992TEU, July 2004, Hyundai HI) also bought by MSC for US$42.5 million. Kowloon Bay was bought two weeks earlier than the Mexico for US$8 million less.

These sales have shown how the Panamax container ship market is setting new benchmarks each week.

The number of container vessel types sold on the secondhand S&P market during the first half of each year from 2018 to 2021.

The number of container vessel types sold on the secondhand S&P market during the first half of each year from 2018 to 2021.

Container Values

With the ever-firming rates across the container sector, we have seen a surge in values. Increased US imports, port congestions and a shortage of capacity are pushing freight rates to record levels on key routes from China to the US and Europe. A secondary outbreak of Covid-19 in Southern China has prompted even more delays and congestion across ports which have tightened supply.

The below figure shows the three-month percentage change in values across the container sector.

As a result of the increased S&P market and rates, the Panamaxes (4,250TEU) have benefitted the most from increased values. For example, 15-year-old 4,250TEU tonnage has more than doubled in value in just three months. At the end of March, a generic 15-year-old Panamax was worth US$20 million, today it is worth US$48 million.

The percentage change in value across the container sectors over the past three months.

The percentage change in value across the container sectors over the past three months.

Container Rates

The below figure shows the prolonged increase in charter rates that is impacting the market.

Every single earnings value has more than doubled since the beginning of the year. For example, Panamax container ships were earning US$19,000/day, today they are earning US$45,000/day.

The US$/day increase in container charter rates across each sub sector.

The US$/day increase in container charter rates across each sub sector.

Container Trade

As we surpass the mid-year point of 2021,  container vessels’ speeds are continuing to increase, as they have been for the last eight months. The average laden speed across all container ships was 14.70 knots in June, showing a 5.2% YoY growth as well MoM growth of 0.5%. New Panamax vessels take the top spot with speeds of 16.37 knots. These high speeds continue to be supported by favourable market conditions.

Average laden speeds for all container vessels in knots.

Average laden speeds for all container vessels in knots.

Alongside increasing speeds, cargo miles have been growing through the first half of 2021, with June’s figures at 161.9 billion TEU-NM, almost back to pre-pandemic levels. Fleet growth is set to increase which may disrupt the balance between supply and demand, but for the near future, this balance looks positive for container vessels, as YoY cargo mile growth continues to exceed YoY fleet growth.

Container Supply and Demand. Percentage growth in cargo miles and live vessels compared to the previous year.

Container Supply and Demand. Percentage growth in cargo miles and live vessels compared to the previous year.

Since the start of 2021, cargo miles from the US rank the highest for New Panamax container vessels, indicating the popularity of US trades for this vessel type, especially in this post-pandemic Covid-19 recovery period.

Top five new Panamax container vessel export countries between 1 January 2021 and 30 June 2021.

Top five new Panamax container vessel export countries between 1 January 2021 and 30 June 2021.

Monthly cargo miles for new Panamax container vessels from the United States of America, in billion TEU-NM.

Monthly cargo miles for new Panamax container vessels from the United States of America, in billion TEU-NM.

Appendix

The below table shows VesselsValue’s size breakdown for each container ship category by naming convention, beam and TEU.

VesselsValue data as of July 2021.

VesselsValue data as of July 2021.

Source: Container News

READ MORE

10 Major Ports In India

Covering a majority of the Indian subcontinent, India is an Asian country that is at the heart of trade across vital shipping routes.

READ MORE

Container congestion continues to devastate global supply chain

Global container congestion persists to wreak havoc on supply chain operations all around the globe.

Container congestion continues to devastate global supply chainGlobal shipping has been facing erratic consumer demand, factory shutdown, and pandemic restrictions that have hampered port operations for months. As an outcome, empty containers are scarce where they are needed.

The Ever Given mishap has compounded the shortage as about half of products passing through the Suez Canal are container ships. Due to the high volume of traffic, unloading has been delayed. Numerous ports are already working at maximum capacity, but port storage fees have grown, somewhat mitigating certain ports’ expenditures.

The ratio of ships in the port to those waiting gives a good idea of the ongoing congestion. Hong Kong, for example, has a 67 % waiting ratio. Although plagued by the Covid-19 outbreak that limited work throughout June, Yantian has made good progress in clearing its backlog, whereas Oakland, Savannah, Seattle, and Vancouver have all achieved productivity levels over 65 %.

It’s not simply busy off the California coasts of Los Angeles and Long Beach. Ships awaiting offloading are anchored outside ports from Singapore to Savannah, Georgia, and major European commercial hubs such as Hamburg, Liverpool, and Rotterdam are all experiencing congestion and delays. Hundreds of ships are backed up around Yantian, and one estimate indicates that a huge number of 20-foot containers have been brought to a halt.

Thus, even as Yantian resumes normal functioning specialists like Alan Murphy, CEO of Copenhagen-based Sea-Intelligence, a maritime data and analysis company, have warned that shockwaves will likely be felt far and wide.

“With literally hundreds of thousands of containers stacking up in South China, while the other ports are already overburdened, and an acute scarcity of vessel space and empty containers, the South China port scenario is swiftly deteriorating into a big systemic disruption,” said Murphy.

Source: Container News

READ MORE

Gwangyang port and LG unit to create 5G container cranes

South Korea’s Yeosu-Gwangyang Port Authority has signed a memorandum of understanding with compatriot cellular carrier LG Uplus Corp. to develop 5G remotely controlled container cranes, which will operate using multi-access edge computing (MEC) technology.

Gwangyang port and LG unit to create 5G container cranesMEC technology allows pilots to control the container cranes from a cockpit far from the container yard, through cloud computing and 5G solution. Located in South Jeolla province, Gwangyang port, South Korea’s second-busiest container hub after Busan, aims to position itself as a smart port.

Both sides will launch their collaboration with MEC and low-delay video transmission solutions to two rubber-tyred gantry cranes in Gwangyang port.

Through remote control, more containers can be moved and loading can be automated even when employees are taking their breaks, possibly elevating productivity by 40%. It also helps to improve the working environment for pilots who have to work for eight hours in the cockpit at an altitude of 25 metres.

LG Uplus, a unit of the LG chaebol, plans to build a 5G base station in the terminal and provide a communication environment that enables stable remote control by utilising the Gwangju MEC Centre.

The system will include a low-delay video transmission solution that reduces delay time by maximising ultra-high-capacity video compression. Combined with the 5G network and MEC, the delay time can be reduced to less than 100m/second and the video transmission time can be reduced by more than 84% compared to 4G technology.

The South Jeolla provincial administration plans to subsidise part of the costs so that investment from the private sector will not be needed.

Seo Jae-yong, managing director of LG Uplus’ smart infrastructure unit, said that the company plans to expand its smart port business nationwide, having built a remote-controlled crane at Dongwon Pusan Container Terminal in Busan Port in May.

Martina Li
Asia Correspondent

READ MORE

Understanding Transit Time in Shipping

A very simple explanation for the term transit time is that – it is the time or the number of days taken for a consignment to move from point A to point B. In shipping terminology, this is referred to as transit time or transit days.

It is an important factor affecting businesses and any other operations that procure raw materials, parts, or finished goods from suppliers to be reprocessed, repackaged, or simply redistributed.

Generally referred to as raw materials, these items are shipped by suppliers based on purchase orders from the customer, using a convenient and economical mode of transport as agreed between the two.

Why is transit time important? Without receiving raw materials, finished goods, or parts from their suppliers on time, any business will not be able to operate. They will not be able to meet their commitments to their customers.

Transit time is an important component of lead time. In business, lead time is the total time taken to realize a purchase order placed with a supplier.

It is a measure of the total time taken from the moment a purchase order is placed with a supplier till the goods are received at the purchaser’s warehouse.

Lean Business Models and Lead Time

Lean business models operate on a strict policy of waste elimination and cost reduction. In the current competitive business environment, most organizations operate on lean business models.

What are lean business models? A lean business model is all about minimizing or eliminating waste within an organization. This results in increased customer satisfaction and ultimately the profitability of the organization.

Companies that follow the lean business model achieve their objective by focusing on improvement and optimization of their processes and increasing the knowledge base of their employees, thereby reducing costs.

Here, the lead times of the required materials play an important role. Variations in transit time affect the lead time. Fluctuating lead times can make purchase order forecasting difficult and unrealistic. Without getting the raw materials at the right time, companies cannot meet their deadlines.

When raw materials are received earlier than required, it takes up storage space and also results in unnecessary stockholding for the company.

Any delay in the receipt of raw materials would affect the processing or production cycle. It might result in stock-outs that affect the timely delivery of goods to customers.

Just-In-Time (JIT) is an inventory management concept in which material and labour for manufacturing are arranged to arrive only when required and just in time for the manufacturing process.

 

Lead Time and Transit Days

Typically, the breakup of lead time is as follows:

Total Lead Time = Goods ready days + Transit days + Clearance and delivery days

Goods ready days (GRD) is calculated as the number of days taken from the time of placing a purchase order with a supplier to the time it is available to the transporter for shipment.

The supplier has to have the goods ready as agreed with the buyer and transporter. However, there may be delays from the supplier’s end in readying the goods.

Production bottlenecks, issues with packing and labelling, or incomplete export formalities and documentation can cause delays.

Unexpected delays from the supplier’s side may result in the cargo missing its sailing. If it is a transhipment cargo there is a very likely chance of it missing all the subsequent sailings from the other ports.

Sometimes a purchase order may consist of different goods from different sources that may have to be consolidated by the supplier. Delay in consolidation can upset the delivery deadline that has been agreed with the transporter.

Transit days (TD) is the number of days taken from when the goods are picked up from the supplier by the transporter, till it is discharged at the destination port.

Transit days include the time taken to move it from the supplier’s warehouse to the port of origin, storage days at the port if any, the sailing time, and finally, the time taken to discharge the cargo at the destination port, ready for customs clearance.

The number of days it takes for customs clearance of the goods and their delivery to the customer’s premises is the clearance and delivery days (CDD).

A simple example of the breakup of lead time by its different components is given below.

The Techstart company in Chennai, India places a purchase order for 20 pieces of machinery with Yamaguchi & Sons, Yokohama, Japan on 25 June. As agreed between both companies, the number of days to ready this order is 10 days.

On 5 Jul, the transporter picks up these 20 units and puts them in a 20’ GP container, and moves it to the port of Yokohama. It is booked by vessel MV Marijan that sets sail on the 7 Jul. The sailing time is 19 days from Yokohama to Chennai.

The vessel berths at Chennai port on 26 July and the goods are discharged the same day. Customs clearance takes another 3 days and the container is transported to the warehouse of Techstart company on 29 July.

The number of days taken for each component is as follows:

Goods Ready Days (GRD) Transit Days (TD) Clearance & Delivery Days (CDD) Total Lead Time Days (LTD)
25 Jun – 5 Jul 5 – 7 Jul + 7 – 26 Jul 26 – 29 Jul 25 Jun – 29 Jul
10 2+19 3 34

Forecasting

Forecasting is the technique of predicting future demands by using historic data. Different organizations use different forecasting models to arrive at the demand quantities.

The 2 main types of forecasting are quantitative forecasting and qualitative forecasting. Quantitative forecasting makes use of historical data to calculate future demands while qualitative forecasting makes use of judgment based on past or recurring events.

In qualitative forecasting, numerical data is not used for working out future demands and it relies heavily on experienced and knowledgeable company staff or forecasters.

Lead time is critical in forecasting and it is used to work out the optimum order quantities. Forecasters and planners have to consider the different factors that may cause delays to their orders and arrive at the purchase order figures accordingly. Maintaining an optimum buffer stock to tide over such emergencies is one option available to forecasters and planners.

Factors Affecting Transit Time

Several factors affect the transit time of goods.

Port terminals usually have their woes which in turn may affect the transit time of vessels. Inadequate handling equipment at ports, equipment breakdown, and labour problems are just some of these.

Any of these problems can result in delays to vessels, whether incoming or waiting to set sail. Delays affect the loading and unloading of cargo.

Blank sailing of a cargo vessel can upset the loading and unloading of cargo at these ports. What is blank sailing? Blank or void sailing is when a ship does not call at a scheduled port.

It could be a single port that is omitted or more than one, in the string. All the ports that are covered by the ship during its voyage are called a string.

Blank sailing affects all the cargo waiting to get loaded onboard the ship from the port or ports. Cargo that could not be loaded will have to take the next available sailing. It results in extended transit time.

It affects unloading too. When a ship skips a port, the cargo that should have been offloaded at that port is discharged at the next port of call. Once again, the transit time is stretched. For more details on blank sailing please read the article available on the following link:

Transit time can be affected by port congestions when the ship is not able to get a berthing slot. Bad weather or changes to the vessel’s sailing schedule can also affect transit time.

Forecasters and planners have to consider all the various factors and plan accordingly. These factors include weather conditions at origin and enroute, holidays and seasonal market closures, etc.

Customs clearance of cargo after it is discharged at the destination port must be planned well. Discrepancies or errors in documentation, failure to arrange the necessary labour and transport, etc. can unnecessarily extend the lead time.

Reference: Marine Insight

READ MORE

CMA CGM introduces new intermodal services in Asia and Africa

The French carrier, CMA CGM has announced the launch of two new intermodal solutions in Asia and Africa.

CMA CGM introduces new intermodal services in Asia and AfricaFirstly, CMA CGM has introduced its new rail product connecting the world from/to Aswan, Egypt with a weekly train through Damietta and Ain Sokhna corridors connecting with Med Lines and Rex.

CMA CGM said that transit time inland to Aswan Ramp is three days and 6th of October Ramp one day. Additionally, Aswan is reached in 31 days from Shanghai and 6th of October in 29 days.

CMA CGM's intermodal rail solution from/to Aswan, Egypt

CMA CGM’s intermodal rail solution from/to Aswan, Egypt

Furthermore, the Marseille-based container company has announced that in complement to its current rail service Beira, Mozambique > Harare, Zimbabwe, it will offer a new product with a weekly departure from Maputo, Mozambique on Mozex service to Ramp Harare, Bulawayo and Gweru in Zimbabwe.

The transit time inland to Zimbabwe Ramp is within five days, according to CMA CGM’s announcement, while Harare, Bulawayo and Gweru are called from Shanghai in 29 days, Qingdao in 35 days and Singapore in 21 days.

CMA CGM's intermodal rail solutions in Zimbabwe from Maputo Ramp, Mozambique

CMA CGM’s intermodal rail solutions in Zimbabwe from Maputo Ramp, Mozambique

Source: Container News

READ MORE

MSC sets increased prices from Asia to Antwerp and Valencia

Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC) has announced new rates from Sri Lanka, India and Pakistan to two of the most important European hubs, the ports of Antwerp and Valencia.

The Swiss container carrier said the new charges will be effective from 1 August until further notice but not beyond 31 August 2021.

Port of loading Port of discharge Commodity Rate
20 DV 40 DV 40 HC
Colombo Antwerp Freight All US$3,000 US$4,300 US$4,300
Kinds (FAK)
Colombo Valencia Freight All US$3,000 US$4,300 US$4,300
Kinds (FAK)

 

Port of loading Port of discharge Commodity Rate
20 DV 40 DV & HC 40 HR
Nhava Sheva Antwerp Freight All US$4,250 US$5,500 US$6,000
Kinds (FAK)
Chennai Antwerp Freight All US$4,150 US$5,300 US$5,800
Kinds (FAK)
Kolkata Antwerp Freight All US$4,150 US$5,300 US$5,800
Kinds (FAK)
Port Qasim Antwerp Freight All US$4,250 US$5,500 US$6,000
Kinds (FAK)

 

Port of loading Port of discharge Commodity Rate
20 DV 40 DV & HC 40 HR
Nhava Sheva Valencia Freight All US$4,250 US$5,500 US$6,000
Kinds (FAK)
Chennai Valencia Freight All US$4,150 US$5,300 US$5,800
Kinds (FAK)
Kolkata Valencia Freight All US$4,150 US$5,300 US$5,800
Kinds (FAK)
Port Qasim Valencia Freight All US$4,250 US$5,500 US$6,000
Kinds (FAK)

Reference: Container News

READ MORE

Four new container vessels in Chittagong-Colombo route to lessen export backlog

The Chittagong Port Authority (CPA) has approved plying of four new feeder vessels in Chittagong-Colombo route in a bid to lessen the mounting export cargo backlog at the inland container depots (ICDs).

Of the 15,300 export-laden container backlog in Chittagong off docks, 70% are of Maersk Line which failed to be carried to Colombo due to the lack of feeder vessels, according to the shippers.

Maersk has taken huge booking of containers despite it has no feeder vessels in Chittagong-Colombo route, as the company carries boxes in this route using the vessels of Seacon, OEL, and some other third-party operators.

The CPA on 12 July gave approval for two new vessels owned by Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC). The first vessel is the 1,000TEU OEL India, which sails under the flag of Panama, and the second one is Hermann Schepers, a 1,100TEU boxship registered in Antigua Barbuda.

Mohammad Ajmir Hossain Chowdhury, MSC’s deputy general manager said the two vessels will start plying in the route after one week, while he pointed out that none shows interest to run vessel in Chittagong-Colombo route.

Due to the vessel crisis in this route, MSC decided to deploy two vessels bringing from other routes, according to Chowdhury, who hopes “the two vessels will help lower the crisis to some extent.”

Meanwhile, two other new feeder vessels of Everbest Logistics Ltd, named Minion and Contship Lex, also got the port’s approval.

Gias Uddin Ahmed, assistant manager of the company said these vessels will also be able to carry boxes in the route within a week.

The four new vessels will be able to carry a total of 5,000TEU at a time, thus container backlog may lessen gradually, according to port officials.

At a meeting this week, the port authority decided to give permission immediately after any company submits an application to ply feeder vessel in Chittagong-Colombo route. Additionally, applications seeking permission to start a new feeder service in Chittagong-Singapore route will also be processed without delay.

The decision is taken to meet the shortage of feeder capacity from Chittagong port which has been seriously hindering transportation of containers to and from Bangladesh.

At the meeting, the apparel exporters discussed that buyers are placing increased volume of bookings to Maersk over their capacity which is causing congestion at depots. The Bangladesh Garment Manufacturers and Exporters Association (BGMEA) will raise the issue to the Buyers Forum for taking the facts into consideration.

Sharar Nayel
Bangladesh Correspondent

READ MORE

What is a Letter of Credit in Shipping?

International trade is very competitive, and businesses, banks and financial institutions go the extra mile to provide the best service to their customers.

READ MORE

 

Recent Comments by Macnels Macnels

    No comments by Macnels Macnels